Triple
T12950707
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Heraclitean doctrine of flux |
E309883
|
entity |
| Predicate | oftenIllustratedBy |
P107664
|
FINISHED |
| Object | river analogy |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: river analogy | Statement: [Heraclitean doctrine of flux, oftenIllustratedBy, river analogy]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: oftenIllustratedBy Context triple: [Heraclitean doctrine of flux, oftenIllustratedBy, river analogy]
-
A.
hasIllustrationsBy
Indicates that one entity (such as a work or publication) includes illustrations that were created by another entity (the illustrator).
-
B.
hasIllustrations
Indicates that an entity includes or is accompanied by visual illustrations.
-
C.
hasIllustratedCharacters
Indicates that something includes or features characters that are depicted through illustrations.
-
D.
laterIllustrator
Indicates that one entity served as an illustrator for a work or project at a later time than another referenced illustrator or illustration.
-
E.
commonlyDepictedOn
Indicates that something is frequently shown or represented on the surface, medium, or context of another thing.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdfb57a88190836b743e2825feca |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d97e59a4c88190907d05b8d57dae89 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d97dba57988190b786ffed55687a72 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:46 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d97e5811f481908178fac6d2e0efcd |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:43 p.m.