Triple

T1293857
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Felix Frankfurter E27607 entity
Predicate notableCase P4 FINISHED
Object West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette E81012 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette | Statement: [Felix Frankfurter, notableCase, West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette
Context triple: [Felix Frankfurter, notableCase, West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette]
  • A. West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette chosen
    West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette is a landmark 1943 U.S. Supreme Court decision, authored by Justice Robert H. Jackson, that held the government cannot compel public school students to salute the flag or recite the Pledge of Allegiance, firmly protecting freedom of speech and religious liberty.
  • B. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
    Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court case that established students do not lose their First Amendment free speech rights at school, so long as their expression does not substantially disrupt the educational environment.
  • C. Schenck v. United States
    Schenck v. United States is a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the “clear and present danger” test, allowing the government to restrict speech during wartime.
  • D. Everson v. Board of Education
    Everson v. Board of Education is a 1947 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause to the states and articulated the modern “wall of separation between church and state” doctrine.
  • E. Brandenburg v. Ohio
    Brandenburg v. Ohio is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly strengthened free speech protections by establishing the "imminent lawless action" test for when advocacy of violence can be punished under the First Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a496d6682881909ba658f1c1e0e2b0 completed March 1, 2026, 7:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c0f2eb608190a0ac47a73adae19b completed March 1, 2026, 10:42 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69acacc1e7948190a1ecd240c751d258 completed March 7, 2026, 10:54 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:51 p.m.