Triple
T12934338
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Core Altaic |
E309464
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasKeyDebate |
P15176
|
FINISHED |
| Object | genetic relationship vs. areal convergence |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: genetic relationship vs. areal convergence | Statement: [Core Altaic, hasKeyDebate, genetic relationship vs. areal convergence]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasKeyDebate Context triple: [Core Altaic, hasKeyDebate, genetic relationship vs. areal convergence]
-
A.
hasDebate
Indicates that there is a formal discussion or argument between entities, typically presenting opposing viewpoints on a topic.
-
B.
hasDebateTerm
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or characterized by, a specific term used in a debate or argumentative context.
-
C.
hasDebateStatus
Indicates that an entity (such as a topic, motion, or issue) is associated with a particular stage or condition within a debate process (e.g., proposed, ongoing, concluded).
-
D.
hasNotableDebates
Indicates that there have been significant or widely recognized debates or controversies involving the related entities.
-
E.
hasLongTermDebateOn
chosen
Indicates that there is an ongoing, extended period of discussion, disagreement, or argument concerning a particular topic or issue.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdfa933c8190b5a27aa4a08a19b7 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d97e59a4c88190907d05b8d57dae89 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d97db69f548190a1a693bc0d6c191a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:42 p.m.