Triple
T12932886
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gordian Knot legend |
E309425
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAssociatedDeityOrPower |
P102272
|
FINISHED |
| Object | oracular prophecy |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: oracular prophecy | Statement: [Gordian Knot legend, hasAssociatedDeityOrPower, oracular prophecy]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAssociatedDeityOrPower Context triple: [Gordian Knot legend, hasAssociatedDeityOrPower, oracular prophecy]
-
A.
associatedDeityOrForce
chosen
Indicates that one entity is linked to, represented by, or under the influence of a particular deity or supernatural force.
-
B.
hasDeity
Indicates that one entity recognizes, worships, or is associated with another entity as its deity or divine figure.
-
C.
hasDeityAspect
Indicates that one entity embodies, represents, or functions as a specific divine aspect or manifestation of another deity.
-
D.
hasComponentDeity
Indicates that an entity (such as a religion, mythology, or pantheon) includes a particular deity as one of its constituent or associated divine figures.
-
E.
hasGuardianDeity
Indicates that an entity is under the protection or patronage of a specific guardian deity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdfa933c8190b5a27aa4a08a19b7 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d97e59a4c88190907d05b8d57dae89 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d97db69f548190a1a693bc0d6c191a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:42 p.m.