Triple
T12932838
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | King Midas |
E309424
|
entity |
| Predicate | laterRetoldIn |
P104194
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Latin literature |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Latin literature | Statement: [King Midas, laterRetoldIn, Latin literature]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterRetoldIn Context triple: [King Midas, laterRetoldIn, Latin literature]
-
A.
retellsStoryOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity recounts or narrates the story originally told or experienced by another entity.
-
B.
laterAdaptedIn
Indicates that something was subsequently adapted, modified, or reworked in a later context, version, or medium.
-
C.
laterRepublishedWith
Indicates that an existing work was republished at a later time in a modified or updated form specified by the related entity.
-
D.
laterWrittenIn
Indicates that one text or version was written at a later time than another, establishing a chronological order between the writings.
-
E.
laterAdaptedFor
Indicates that something was subsequently modified or repurposed to serve a new use, context, or medium.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdfa933c8190b5a27aa4a08a19b7 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d97e59a4c88190907d05b8d57dae89 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d97db69f548190a1a693bc0d6c191a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:42 p.m.