Triple
T12932717
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Phrygian language |
E309422
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasVerbTense |
P9327
|
FINISHED |
| Object | present |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: present | Statement: [Phrygian language, hasVerbTense, present]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasVerbTense Context triple: [Phrygian language, hasVerbTense, present]
-
A.
hasTense
chosen
Indicates that an action, event, or state is associated with a specific grammatical tense (such as past, present, or future).
-
B.
hasTenseAspect
Indicates that a verb or clause is associated with a specific grammatical tense and aspect configuration.
-
C.
hasPastTenseEnding
Indicates that a verb form ends with a morphological marker typically used to express past tense.
-
D.
hasVerbAspect
Indicates that a verb or verbal expression is associated with a particular grammatical aspect (such as perfective, imperfective, or progressive) describing the temporal structure of the action or state.
-
E.
hasFutureTenseEnding
Indicates that a verb or expression carries a morphological ending marking future tense.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdfa933c8190b5a27aa4a08a19b7 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d97e59a4c88190907d05b8d57dae89 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d97db69f548190a1a693bc0d6c191a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:42 p.m.