Triple
T12926167
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cowboy Casanova |
E309248
|
entity |
| Predicate | releasedAsLeadSingle |
P107056
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Cowboy Casanova, releasedAsLeadSingle, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: releasedAsLeadSingle Context triple: [Cowboy Casanova, releasedAsLeadSingle, true]
-
A.
releasedAsSingleIn
Indicates that a musical work or track was issued as a standalone single in a specific year or time period.
-
B.
releasedAsSingleFor
Indicates that a particular track or song was issued as a standalone single specifically to promote or represent a given album, project, or release.
-
C.
releasedAsSingleInTerritory
Indicates that a work (such as a song or recording) was issued as a single in a specific geographic territory or market.
-
D.
releasedWithSingle
Indicates that a work (such as an album or EP) was released together with, or as part of the release of, a specific single.
-
E.
leadSingleFeaturing
Indicates that an artist is featured on the lead single of another artist’s release.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdfa933c8190b5a27aa4a08a19b7 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d971eb17c88190bf523da897172a0c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d96fab4d0881909a7a4d66bab9aa85 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d970f6f5748190ad35aff801db53d5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:51 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:42 p.m.