Triple

T12911666
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject H.I.V.E. Five E308877 entity
Predicate recurringRole P90709 FINISHED
Object recurring antagonists LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: recurring antagonists | Statement: [H.I.V.E. Five, recurringRole, recurring antagonists]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: recurringRole
Context triple: [H.I.V.E. Five, recurringRole, recurring antagonists]
  • A. hasRecurringRole chosen
    Indicates that an entity repeatedly appears or participates in a role within an ongoing or multiple related contexts over time.
  • B. roleInRepertoire
    Indicates that an entity serves a specific role or function within a larger repertoire, collection, or set of items.
  • C. continuityRole
    Indicates that one entity serves a continuity-related function in relation to another, such as maintaining consistency or coherence across versions, segments, or states.
  • D. typicalRole
    Indicates that one entity serves as the usual, characteristic, or commonly expected role or function of another entity.
  • E. plannedRole
    Indicates that an entity is expected or intended to assume a particular role or function in a planned or future context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf92b588190acdf2a2291ac4590 completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9719f96248190b746f9d4a468560c completed April 10, 2026, 9:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d96fa9b7708190a9e9fa30f59ff580 completed April 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:41 p.m.