Triple

T12904946
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Arizona ballot collection law (H.B. 2023) E308706 entity
Predicate subjectOfCase P17092 FINISHED
Object Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee E59482 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee | Statement: [Arizona ballot collection law (H.B. 2023), subjectOfCase, Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
Context triple: [Arizona ballot collection law (H.B. 2023), subjectOfCase, Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee]
  • A. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee chosen
    Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the scope of federal protections against voting discrimination, particularly under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
  • B. Arizona v. Johnson
    Arizona v. Johnson is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified police authority to frisk passengers during lawful traffic stops when officers reasonably suspect they are armed and dangerous.
  • C. McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
    McConnell v. Federal Election Commission is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (McCain–Feingold Act), significantly shaping modern campaign finance law.
  • D. DeBoer v. Snyder
    DeBoer v. Snyder was a federal court case challenging Michigan’s same-sex marriage ban that became one of the key cases consolidated into the landmark Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
  • E. Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
    Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission is a 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of using an independent commission, rather than the state legislature, to draw congressional district boundaries.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf92b588190acdf2a2291ac4590 completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d971831bd48190b0ecd13e7181bbc6 completed April 10, 2026, 9:54 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f6a565ce508190a73f33708e61dc7d completed May 3, 2026, 1:31 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:40 p.m.