Triple
T12903319
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Work-Related Activity Group |
E308664
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAgeCondition |
P95456
|
FINISHED |
| Object | working-age adults |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: working-age adults | Statement: [Work-Related Activity Group, hasAgeCondition, working-age adults]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAgeCondition Context triple: [Work-Related Activity Group, hasAgeCondition, working-age adults]
-
A.
hasAge
Indicates that an entity possesses a specific age value, typically expressed as a number of time units since its birth or creation.
-
B.
containsAge
Indicates that one entity includes or specifies the age value or age-related information of another entity.
-
C.
canAgeFor
Indicates that one entity is capable of undergoing an aging or maturation process for the benefit, use, or context of another entity.
-
D.
hasLowerAge
Indicates that one entity is younger in age than another entity.
-
E.
ageConstraint
chosen
Indicates a restriction or condition based on the age of an entity relative to a specified threshold or range.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf92b588190acdf2a2291ac4590 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d971820e008190bf8bc7c392c8bcbb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:54 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d96fa776648190b9b5c30722ea50b6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:40 p.m.