Triple
T12900829
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Henrik Lissner |
E308604
|
entity |
| Predicate | softwareStyle |
P53448
|
FINISHED |
| Object | modular configuration framework |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: modular configuration framework | Statement: [Henrik Lissner, softwareStyle, modular configuration framework]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: softwareStyle Context triple: [Henrik Lissner, softwareStyle, modular configuration framework]
-
A.
programmingStyle
Indicates the particular approach, methodology, or paradigm an entity uses when writing or organizing code.
-
B.
developmentStyle
chosen
Indicates the manner or approach in which something is developed, such as the methodology, process, or style guiding its creation or evolution.
-
C.
structuralStyle
Indicates the architectural or design style that characterizes the structure or form of an entity.
-
D.
structureStyle
Indicates the architectural or design style characterizing how a structure is built or formed.
-
E.
codeStandard
Indicates that an entity adheres to, complies with, or is governed by a specified coding or programming standard.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf7c1f0819098102569a8d8cbf5 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d97180ee708190b60a3e58c42f764f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:54 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d96fa776648190b9b5c30722ea50b6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:40 p.m.