Triple
T12894311
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Wonders |
E308451
|
entity |
| Predicate | roleOfTBPlayer |
P39782
|
FINISHED |
| Object | bassist |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: bassist | Statement: [The Wonders, roleOfTBPlayer, bassist]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleOfTBPlayer Context triple: [The Wonders, roleOfTBPlayer, bassist]
-
A.
roleInGameplay
Indicates the specific function or responsibility an entity has within the context of gameplay or game mechanics.
-
B.
roleInTauris
Indicates that an entity has a specific role or function within the context of Tauris (e.g., a work, setting, or domain associated with Tauris).
-
C.
typeOfRole
Indicates that one entity specifies the kind or category of role that another entity holds or performs.
-
D.
roleInDialogue
Indicates that an entity participates in a dialogue with a specific conversational role (e.g., speaker, listener, moderator) relative to other participants.
-
E.
associatedPlayerRole
chosen
Indicates a relationship where a specific role or function is linked to, or held by, a particular player.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf7c1f0819098102569a8d8cbf5 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d971484aa08190a8adfafabe600903 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d96fa776648190b9b5c30722ea50b6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:40 p.m.