Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: South Carolina v. Katzenbach | Statement: [Section 10 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, wasUpheldIn, South Carolina v. Katzenbach]

Target entity: South Carolina v. Katzenbach
Context triple: [Section 10 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, wasUpheldIn, South Carolina v. Katzenbach]

• A. South Carolina v. Katzenbach chosen
  South Carolina v. Katzenbach is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, affirming broad federal power to combat racial discrimination in voting.
• B. Katzenbach v. McClung
  Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
• C. Katzenbach v. Morgan
  Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
• D. Edwards v. South Carolina
  Edwards v. South Carolina is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court decision that overturned the breach-of-the-peace convictions of civil rights demonstrators, affirming their First Amendment rights to peaceful protest and assembly.
• E. Wesberry v. Sanders
  Wesberry v. Sanders is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the principle that congressional districts must be drawn so that each person's vote is as equal in weight as practicable, laying groundwork for the "one person, one vote" standard.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: wasUpheldIn
Context triple: [Section 10 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, wasUpheldIn, South Carolina v. Katzenbach]

• A. upheldBy chosen
  Indicates that one entity is supported, maintained, or validated by another, often through approval, enforcement, or confirmation of its validity.
• B. upheldYear
  Indicates the year in which a decision, ruling, or status was confirmed and maintained rather than overturned.
• C. wasOverturnedByCourt
  Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or judgment was reversed or nullified by a court.
• D. doctrineHeld
  Indicates that an agent adheres to, supports, or maintains a particular doctrine or set of principles.
• E. overturnedLaw
  Indicates that a previously established law has been invalidated or reversed, typically by a higher legal authority or court decision.
• F. None of above.