Triple
T12885882
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | John Singer |
E308222
|
entity |
| Predicate | innerState |
P107449
|
FINISHED |
| Object | lonely |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lonely | Statement: [John Singer, innerState, lonely]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: innerState Context triple: [John Singer, innerState, lonely]
-
A.
inState
Indicates that an entity is currently located within or belongs to a particular state or condition.
-
B.
principalState
Indicates that an entity serves as the primary or main state associated with another entity or context.
-
C.
builtInState
Indicates that an entity was constructed or established within a particular state or region.
-
D.
inStateSince
Indicates that an entity has been in a particular state continuously starting from a specified point in time.
-
E.
secondaryState
Indicates that an entity is in a subordinate or less primary condition, status, or mode relative to its main or primary state.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf7c1f0819098102569a8d8cbf5 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d97c7f91d08190aac2f6419d3ba992 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d96fa55b888190ab1612e93c41aec4 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d97c7d0598819080cab0a2314bc106 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:39 p.m.