Triple
T12883257
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sewel Convention |
E308156
|
entity |
| Predicate | judicialFinding |
P107431
|
FINISHED |
| Object | not legally enforceable by the courts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: not legally enforceable by the courts | Statement: [Sewel Convention, judicialFinding, not legally enforceable by the courts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: judicialFinding Context triple: [Sewel Convention, judicialFinding, not legally enforceable by the courts]
-
A.
judgmentInvolves
Indicates that a particular judgment, decision, or legal ruling includes, concerns, or pertains to a specified entity or matter.
-
B.
decisionCourt
Indicates that a particular court rendered the decision or judgment in a given legal case or proceeding.
-
C.
arbitralTribunalFinding
Indicates that an arbitral tribunal has made a formal determination or decision regarding a dispute between parties.
-
D.
leadingJudgmentBy
Indicates a relationship where one judgment or legal decision is treated as the primary or authoritative basis guiding or influencing another judgment.
-
E.
judicialArticle
Indicates that there is a specific legal or judicial article that governs, defines, or is applied to the relationship or action between the entities.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf7c1f0819098102569a8d8cbf5 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d97c7f91d08190aac2f6419d3ba992 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d96fa55b888190ab1612e93c41aec4 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d97c7d0598819080cab0a2314bc106 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:39 p.m.