Triple
T12882390
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rankin County Sheriff's Office |
E308128
|
entity |
| Predicate | detentionFunction |
P107423
|
FINISHED |
| Object | operating county jail |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: operating county jail | Statement: [Rankin County Sheriff's Office, detentionFunction, operating county jail]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: detentionFunction Context triple: [Rankin County Sheriff's Office, detentionFunction, operating county jail]
-
A.
detainedFor
Indicates that one entity is being held in custody or confinement because of, or as a consequence of, another entity (such as a reason, charge, or event).
-
B.
detentionEvent
Indicates an event in which an entity is formally held, confined, or kept in custody, typically by an authority, for a period of time.
-
C.
detainedBy
Indicates that an entity is being held in custody or confinement by another entity, typically an authority or controlling party.
-
D.
detainsUnder
Indicates that one entity holds another in custody or confinement under a specific legal authority, provision, or condition.
-
E.
detentionType
Indicates the specific category or form of detention applied to an entity within a custodial or restrictive context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf69bc48190af6c2621f28ca351 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d97c7f91d08190aac2f6419d3ba992 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d96fa55b888190ab1612e93c41aec4 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d97c7d0598819080cab0a2314bc106 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:39 p.m.