Triple

T12870001
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pepe Jeans E307822 entity
Predicate hasBrand P1500 FINISHED
Object Pepe Jeans London E307822 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pepe Jeans London | Statement: [Pepe Jeans, hasBrand, Pepe Jeans London]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pepe Jeans London
Context triple: [Pepe Jeans, hasBrand, Pepe Jeans London]
  • A. Pepe Jeans chosen
    Pepe Jeans is a British denim and casualwear fashion brand known for its trendy jeans and youthful, urban style.
  • B. Sasson Jeans
    Sasson Jeans was a popular American denim and sportswear brand that gained prominence in the late 1970s and 1980s for its fashion-forward jeans and memorable advertising campaigns.
  • C. Desmond Jeans
    Desmond Jeans was a British actor active in the early to mid-20th century, known for his work on stage and in film.
  • D. Ursula Jeans
    Ursula Jeans was a British stage and film actress known for her versatile character roles in mid-20th-century cinema and theatre.
  • E. Hilfiger Denim
    Hilfiger Denim is a casual clothing line under the Tommy Hilfiger fashion label, focusing on youthful, denim-centered apparel with a classic American style.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf69bc48190af6c2621f28ca351 completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d970905784819091631161a9de98c5 completed April 10, 2026, 9:50 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f69bb4b28c8190a4ec9cad4e1e0f05 completed May 3, 2026, 12:49 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:38 p.m.