Triple
T12869880
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Etro |
E307820
|
entity |
| Predicate | designSignature |
P15592
|
FINISHED |
| Object | use of bold colors |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: use of bold colors | Statement: [Etro, designSignature, use of bold colors]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: designSignature Context triple: [Etro, designSignature, use of bold colors]
-
A.
designedSignatureInstrument
Indicates that an entity created or developed a specific signature instrument associated with a particular person or brand.
-
B.
signatureWork
Indicates that the work is a defining or most representative creation associated with an entity (such as a person, group, or organization).
-
C.
signature
Indicates that one entity has provided an official or personal signed endorsement, authorization, or acknowledgment on or for another entity.
-
D.
signatureTheme
chosen
Indicates that something serves as a distinctive, defining theme strongly associated with a particular entity or context.
-
E.
signatureConcept
Indicates that one concept is the defining or characteristic idea that most distinctly represents or identifies another concept.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf69bc48190af6c2621f28ca351 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d97c7f91d08190aac2f6419d3ba992 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d96fa55b888190ab1612e93c41aec4 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:38 p.m.