Triple

T12863238
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Teschen Piasts E307648 entity
Predicate partOf P40 FINISHED
Object Silesian Piasts E841201 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Silesian Piasts | Statement: [Teschen Piasts, partOf, Silesian Piasts]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Silesian Piasts
Context triple: [Teschen Piasts, partOf, Silesian Piasts]
  • A. Silesian Piasts chosen
    The Silesian Piasts were a branch of the medieval Polish Piast dynasty that ruled various Silesian duchies and played a key role in the region’s political fragmentation and development.
  • B. Pomeranian Piasts
    The Pomeranian Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s first ruling Piast dynasty that governed parts of Pomerania during the Middle Ages.
  • C. Czersk Piasts
    The Czersk Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s early medieval Piast royal family, associated with the duchy centered around Czersk in Mazovia.
  • D. Racibórz Piasts
    The Racibórz Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s medieval Piast dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Racibórz in Silesia.
  • E. Cieszyn Piasts
    The Cieszyn Piasts were a regional branch of the Polish Piast royal dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Cieszyn in Silesia during the Middle Ages and early modern period.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf5e7cc8190be357278bc5ba3bb completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9708cf6b48190886a99e04d85d348 completed April 10, 2026, 9:50 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f6f5c044388190b0832e44c59a8537 completed May 3, 2026, 7:14 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:37 p.m.