Triple

T12860836
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Freddy Benson E307581 entity
Predicate associatedWithScam P54348 FINISHED
Object confidence tricks LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: confidence tricks | Statement: [Freddy Benson, associatedWithScam, confidence tricks]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithScam
Context triple: [Freddy Benson, associatedWithScam, confidence tricks]
  • A. isSuspiciousOf
    Indicates that one entity believes another entity or situation may be untrustworthy, harmful, or involved in wrongdoing.
  • B. illegalActivityAssociatedWith chosen
    Indicates that there is a connection between an entity and an unlawful or criminal activity.
  • C. associatedWithReputation
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked to, influenced by, or characterized in terms of another entity’s reputation or perceived standing.
  • D. associatedWithCompromise
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked to, involved in, or affected by a security compromise or breach.
  • E. associatedWithUrbanLegend
    Indicates a relationship where something is connected to, derived from, or commonly regarded as part of an urban legend.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf5e7cc8190be357278bc5ba3bb completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9714208f881908f7f8a921362909a completed April 10, 2026, 9:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d96fa3002881908000357b1f95a3ac completed April 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:37 p.m.