Triple
T12858267
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rupert Bonington |
E307515
|
entity |
| Predicate | familyName |
P18
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Bonington |
E477698
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bonington | Statement: [Rupert Bonington, familyName, Bonington]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bonington Context triple: [Rupert Bonington, familyName, Bonington]
-
A.
Bonington
chosen
Bonington is an English surname most notably associated with Sir Christian Bonington, a renowned British mountaineer and expedition leader.
-
B.
Lynton
Lynton is a small coastal town in North Devon, England, known for its dramatic cliffside setting above Lynmouth and its Victorian-era cliff railway.
-
C.
Bo’ness
Bo’ness, short for Borrowstounness, is a historic coastal town on the Firth of Forth in Scotland known for its industrial heritage, harbor, and preserved railway.
-
D.
Brighton-Le-Sands
Brighton-Le-Sands is a coastal suburb in southern Sydney, Australia, known for its popular beach, promenade, and views across Botany Bay.
-
E.
Blyth
Blyth is a coastal town and port in southeast Northumberland, England, known historically for coal mining and shipbuilding.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf5e7cc8190be357278bc5ba3bb |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d970242bd48190941cbae0315ebc3d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:48 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f69bac0c1081909217d865aa8bf9a3 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:49 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:37 p.m.