Triple
T12846183
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gilliam County, Oregon |
E307180
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRenewableResource |
P89594
|
FINISHED |
| Object | wind |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: wind | Statement: [Gilliam County, Oregon, hasRenewableResource, wind]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRenewableResource Context triple: [Gilliam County, Oregon, hasRenewableResource, wind]
-
A.
hasEnergyResource
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses, controls, or is associated with a source of usable energy.
-
B.
isRenewable
Indicates that a resource or energy source can be naturally replenished or regenerated within a human-relevant timescale.
-
C.
isRenewableSurface
Indicates that a surface can be restored, replaced, or regenerated without depleting resources or causing long-term degradation.
-
D.
mayBeRenewable
Indicates that an entity has the potential or option to be renewed, but is not guaranteed to be.
-
E.
hasResourcePotential
Indicates that an entity possesses the capacity or suitability to provide, generate, or support a particular resource in the future.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf5e7cc8190be357278bc5ba3bb |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9714208f881908f7f8a921362909a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d96fa3002881908000357b1f95a3ac |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:36 p.m.