Triple
T1284229
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Truth |
E27396
|
entity |
| Predicate | defensiveReputation |
P26731
|
FINISHED |
| Object | solid team defender |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: solid team defender | Statement: [The Truth, defensiveReputation, solid team defender]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: defensiveReputation Context triple: [The Truth, defensiveReputation, solid team defender]
-
A.
tacticalReputation
Indicates the perceived level of skill, reliability, or effectiveness an entity has in planning and executing tactics within a given context.
-
B.
associatedWithReputation
Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked to, influenced by, or characterized in terms of another entity’s reputation or perceived standing.
-
C.
reputationBuiltFor
Indicates that one entity has established or developed a reputation specifically for or in relation to another entity.
-
D.
defends
Indicates that one entity protects or supports another entity against attack, criticism, or harm.
-
E.
criticalReputation
Indicates that an entity is regarded by critics with a particular level or type of esteem, evaluation, or standing based on critical assessments.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a496d3710c8190955dee8bc0dacb50 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c0b599ac819096fca9ada294d939 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bee276d8819092f71c5a1140bb61 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4bf60545c8190901ccfb2cb7c4b41 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:36 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:50 p.m.