Triple
T12840949
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cosmic Cube |
E307048
|
entity |
| Predicate | canEvolveInto |
P38912
|
FINISHED |
| Object | sentient being |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sentient being | Statement: [Cosmic Cube, canEvolveInto, sentient being]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canEvolveInto Context triple: [Cosmic Cube, canEvolveInto, sentient being]
-
A.
evolvesIn
Indicates that an entity undergoes a process of change or development within a specified environment, context, or medium.
-
B.
evolvedWith
Indicates that two or more entities have undergone evolutionary change in mutual influence or parallel over time.
-
C.
evolvedIn
Indicates that an entity originated or developed within a specified environment, context, or location over evolutionary time.
-
D.
evolvesAcross
Indicates a transformation or development of one entity into another across different states, stages, or contexts.
-
E.
evolves
chosen
Indicates that one entity undergoes a process of gradual change or development into another, typically more advanced or different, state or form.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf52b94819096d6f0ba4ab50a98 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9714208f881908f7f8a921362909a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d96fa08cd481909a946046ba63809f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:35 p.m.