Triple
T12839056
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | William Dowdeswell |
E306996
|
entity |
| Predicate | roleInFaction |
P92687
|
FINISHED |
| Object | leading figure in the Rockingham Whigs |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: leading figure in the Rockingham Whigs | Statement: [William Dowdeswell, roleInFaction, leading figure in the Rockingham Whigs]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleInFaction Context triple: [William Dowdeswell, roleInFaction, leading figure in the Rockingham Whigs]
-
A.
factionRole
chosen
Indicates the specific role, function, or position an entity holds within a particular faction or group.
-
B.
hasFaction
Indicates that an entity is affiliated with, belongs to, or is represented by a particular faction or group.
-
C.
roleInGang
Indicates that an entity holds a specific position or function within a gang organization.
-
D.
allianceRole
Indicates the specific function, status, or responsibility an entity holds within an alliance or cooperative partnership.
-
E.
hasOpposingFaction
Indicates that one faction stands in opposition or conflict to another faction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf52b94819096d6f0ba4ab50a98 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9714208f881908f7f8a921362909a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d96fa08cd481909a946046ba63809f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:35 p.m.