Triple
T12832213
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Paris of India |
E306815
|
entity |
| Predicate | capitalOfWhichState |
P6344
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Rajasthan via Jaipur |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rajasthan via Jaipur | Statement: [Paris of India, capitalOfWhichState, Rajasthan via Jaipur]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: capitalOfWhichState Context triple: [Paris of India, capitalOfWhichState, Rajasthan via Jaipur]
-
A.
capitalCityOfAssociatedState
Indicates that a city serves as the capital of the state with which another entity is associated.
-
B.
governingStateCapital
Indicates that a state serves as the governing political authority over the specified capital city.
-
C.
hasCapitalOfContainingState
Indicates that a capital city is the official capital of a state that geographically contains a given area or entity.
-
D.
isStateCapital
chosen
Indicates that a city serves as the official capital of a given state.
-
E.
capitalOfFoundedState
Indicates that a city serves as the capital of a state (or similar political entity) that it also founded or played a founding role in establishing.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf52b94819096d6f0ba4ab50a98 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9714208f881908f7f8a921362909a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d96fa08cd481909a946046ba63809f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:34 p.m.