Triple
T12832169
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pink City |
E306814
|
entity |
| Predicate | languageRegional |
P10892
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Rajasthani |
E31770
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rajasthani | Statement: [Pink City, languageRegional, Rajasthani]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Rajasthani Context triple: [Pink City, languageRegional, Rajasthani]
-
A.
Rajasthani
chosen
Rajasthani is an Indo-Aryan language (or group of dialects) spoken primarily in the Indian state of Rajasthan and surrounding regions.
-
B.
Rajasthani people
Rajasthani people are an ethnolinguistic group from the Indian state of Rajasthan, known for their distinct languages, vibrant folk culture, and rich historical heritage of Rajput kingdoms and desert traditions.
-
C.
Shekhawati
Shekhawati is a dialect of the Rajasthani language spoken primarily in the Shekhawati region of northern Rajasthan, India.
-
D.
Chhattisgarhi
Chhattisgarhi is an Indo-Aryan language spoken primarily in the Indian state of Chhattisgarh and surrounding regions.
-
E.
Shekhawati dialect
The Shekhawati dialect is a regional variety of Rajasthani spoken primarily in the Shekhawati region of Rajasthan, India.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf52b94819096d6f0ba4ab50a98 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d96fb0bb208190bdc4d3dc7909be06 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f69b9bb0b48190ba3f9f92d270db83 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:49 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:34 p.m.