Triple

T12829334
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject BL-5C battery E306742 entity
Predicate usedIn P98 FINISHED
Object Nokia 3120 E310622 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nokia 3120 | Statement: [BL-5C battery, usedIn, Nokia 3120]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Nokia 3120
Context triple: [BL-5C battery, usedIn, Nokia 3120]
  • A. Nokia 3120 chosen
    The Nokia 3120 is a compact early-2000s GSM mobile phone known for its durable candybar design, color display, and long battery life.
  • B. Nokia 3200
    The Nokia 3200 is a mid-2000s GSM mobile phone known for its customizable Xpress-on covers, integrated flashlight, and built-in camera aimed at younger users.
  • C. Nokia 3100
    The Nokia 3100 is a compact early-2000s GSM mobile phone known for its colorful, interchangeable covers, durability, and popularity as an affordable entry-level handset.
  • D. Nokia 3220
    The Nokia 3220 is a mid-2000s candybar mobile phone best known for its customizable, light-up covers and youth-oriented design.
  • E. Nokia 3230
    The Nokia 3230 is a mid-2000s Symbian Series 60 smartphone known for its candybar design, multimedia features, and early mobile internet capabilities.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf52b94819096d6f0ba4ab50a98 completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d96faf9ae481908265e198f917d1e6 completed April 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f746077b288190b8ca7927352a7904 completed May 3, 2026, 12:56 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:34 p.m.