Triple
T12827401
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Japan–United States relations |
E306690
|
entity |
| Predicate | securityAllianceSince |
P10771
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1960 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1960 | Statement: [Japan–United States relations, securityAllianceSince, 1960]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityAllianceSince Context triple: [Japan–United States relations, securityAllianceSince, 1960]
-
A.
securityAlliance
chosen
Indicates a formal cooperative relationship in which entities agree to support and protect each other’s security interests, often including mutual defense or coordinated security measures.
-
B.
securityGuarantee
Indicates a commitment by one party to protect or defend another party against specified threats or risks.
-
C.
securedAgainst
Indicates that one entity is protected or safeguarded against threats, risks, or harmful actions originating from another entity or source.
-
D.
securityAspect
Indicates a relationship where something pertains to, represents, or characterizes a particular aspect or dimension of security.
-
E.
securityArrangementsBy
Indicates that one entity is responsible for providing, organizing, or overseeing security arrangements for another entity or situation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf52b94819096d6f0ba4ab50a98 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9714208f881908f7f8a921362909a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d96fa08cd481909a946046ba63809f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:33 p.m.