Triple
T12815844
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | I've Got to Use My Imagination |
E306397
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasVocalDelivery |
P25705
|
FINISHED |
| Object | intense |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: intense | Statement: [I've Got to Use My Imagination, hasVocalDelivery, intense]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasVocalDelivery Context triple: [I've Got to Use My Imagination, hasVocalDelivery, intense]
-
A.
hasVoiceIn
Indicates that an entity participates by providing a voice role or vocal performance in another entity, such as a work, production, or recording.
-
B.
hasVocals
chosen
Indicates that the subject includes or features vocal elements, such as singing or spoken voice, rather than being purely instrumental or non-vocal.
-
C.
hasVoices
Indicates that an entity possesses or includes one or more vocal parts, voice tracks, or spoken/sung voice elements.
-
D.
hasVocalForces
Indicates that an entity involves or employs vocal performers or vocal parts as a contributing force.
-
E.
hasVocalPerformanceBy
Indicates that a vocal performance in a work or recording is performed by a specified person or group.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf46c448190b1faa55aaacb6317 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d96e9beb30819097c256a5aab9a4c8 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d9640ed7448190b276e7fab649f7d2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:56 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:31 p.m.