Triple

T12797138
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cook County townships E305917 entity
Predicate typicalOffices P5164 FINISHED
Object township supervisor LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: township supervisor | Statement: [Cook County townships, typicalOffices, township supervisor]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalOffices
Context triple: [Cook County townships, typicalOffices, township supervisor]
  • A. officeIn
    Indicates that one entity has an office located within the premises or jurisdiction of another entity.
  • B. officeUnder
    Indicates that one office is subordinate to, managed by, or organizationally within the authority of another office.
  • C. hasOfficeType chosen
    Indicates that an entity’s office is classified as a specific type or category of office.
  • D. controlledOffice
    Indicates that one entity has authority over, manages, or directs the operations of a particular office or administrative location.
  • E. comparableOffice
    Indicates that two offices are sufficiently similar in relevant characteristics (such as size, function, or status) to be meaningfully compared to each other.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf366888190a8cccb982606889c completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d96e6db68481909a2ca8da1287f3e0 completed April 10, 2026, 9:41 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d9640ed7448190b276e7fab649f7d2 completed April 10, 2026, 8:56 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:30 p.m.