Triple

T12784928
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cambridge Centre for Private Law E305598 entity
Predicate focusesOnLegalSystem P16986 FINISHED
Object common law LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: common law | Statement: [Cambridge Centre for Private Law, focusesOnLegalSystem, common law]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: focusesOnLegalSystem
Context triple: [Cambridge Centre for Private Law, focusesOnLegalSystem, common law]
  • A. relatedLegalSystem chosen
    Indicates that there is an association or connection between two legal systems, such as influence, similarity, shared origin, or mutual relevance.
  • B. countryOfLegalSystem
    Indicates the relationship between a legal system and the country in which that legal system is officially established or applied.
  • C. legalSystem
    Indicates the formal framework of laws, rules, and institutions that governs how legal matters are defined, interpreted, and enforced within a society or jurisdiction.
  • D. legalSystemSpecialization
    Indicates that a legal system is specialized or tailored to address a particular domain, issue, or type of case within the broader legal framework.
  • E. legalSystemRegion
    Indicates the geographic or jurisdictional region within which a particular legal system is applicable or in force.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf2b43c819098ae5aa68e61ea58 completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d96e5cb3c08190b8e1e22de8b96e17 completed April 10, 2026, 9:40 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d9640ba0688190973e4e7ec8d4a8e0 completed April 10, 2026, 8:56 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:29 p.m.