Triple
T12781927
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Stranger |
E305527
|
entity |
| Predicate | philosophicalRelation |
P76752
|
FINISHED |
| Object | companion to The Myth of Sisyphus |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: companion to The Myth of Sisyphus | Statement: [The Stranger, philosophicalRelation, companion to The Myth of Sisyphus]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: philosophicalRelation Context triple: [The Stranger, philosophicalRelation, companion to The Myth of Sisyphus]
-
A.
philosophicalRelationTo
chosen
Indicates a conceptual or theoretical connection one entity holds toward another within a philosophical framework or viewpoint.
-
B.
philosophicalConcept
Indicates that one entity is a philosophical concept that characterizes, explains, or is thematically central to the other entity.
-
C.
philosophicalStatus
Indicates the philosophical position, stance, or classification attributed to an entity within a given conceptual or theoretical framework.
-
D.
hasPhilosophyAbout
Indicates that one entity holds, develops, or expresses a philosophical view, theory, or stance concerning another entity or subject.
-
E.
semanticRelation
Indicates a general meaning-based connection between two entities, such as similarity, implication, or conceptual association.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf2b43c819098ae5aa68e61ea58 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d96e5b52048190b279b7ad066efe9f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d9640ba0688190973e4e7ec8d4a8e0 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:56 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:29 p.m.