Triple
T12779819
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Maria Josepha of Bavaria |
E305475
|
entity |
| Predicate | heldStyle |
P69789
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Her Imperial Majesty |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Her Imperial Majesty | Statement: [Maria Josepha of Bavaria, heldStyle, Her Imperial Majesty]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: heldStyle Context triple: [Maria Josepha of Bavaria, heldStyle, Her Imperial Majesty]
-
A.
styleHeldBy
chosen
Indicates that a particular style, design, or aesthetic is possessed, used, or embodied by a specific entity.
-
B.
mayHoldStyle
Indicates that an entity is permitted or able to possess or be associated with a particular style or stylistic attribute.
-
C.
heldAs
Indicates that one entity is kept, maintained, or regarded in a particular state, role, or condition by another entity.
-
D.
holdingType
Indicates the type or category of a holding or possession that one entity has in relation to another or to an asset.
-
E.
heldThat
Indicates that an entity (often a person or authority) maintained, asserted, or concluded that a particular proposition or judgment is true.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf2b43c819098ae5aa68e61ea58 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d96e5a5680819095dcd491486d23e7 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d9640ba0688190973e4e7ec8d4a8e0 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:56 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:29 p.m.