Triple

T12774649
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lady Chatterley's Lover was subject to obscenity trials E305335 entity
Predicate hasNotableCase P7437 FINISHED
Object United States v. One Book Called Ulysses (contextual comparison) E105634 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. One Book Called Ulysses (contextual comparison) | Statement: [Lady Chatterley's Lover was subject to obscenity trials, hasNotableCase, United States v. One Book Called Ulysses (contextual comparison)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: United States v. One Book Called Ulysses (contextual comparison)
Context triple: [Lady Chatterley's Lover was subject to obscenity trials, hasNotableCase, United States v. One Book Called Ulysses (contextual comparison)]
  • A. United States v. One Book Called Ulysses chosen
    United States v. One Book Called Ulysses is a landmark 1933 U.S. federal court decision that lifted the ban on James Joyce’s novel "Ulysses" and significantly redefined American obscenity law in favor of literary freedom.
  • B. Printz v. United States
    Printz v. United States is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited federal power by holding that Congress cannot compel state or local officials to implement federal regulatory programs.
  • C. United States v. Dennett
    United States v. Dennett was a landmark 1930 U.S. obscenity case in which birth control advocate Mary Ware Dennett successfully challenged federal censorship of her sex education pamphlet, helping to expand protections for educational and reformist materials.
  • D. United States v. Comstock
    United States v. Comstock is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s authority to civilly commit mentally ill, sexually dangerous federal prisoners beyond their release date under the Constitution’s Necessary and Proper Clause.
  • E. United States v. O'Brien
    United States v. O'Brien is a landmark 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a federal law banning the destruction of draft cards and established an important test for evaluating government regulation of symbolic speech under the First Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf2b43c819098ae5aa68e61ea58 completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d96df6b3c88190b0bbe70de8ddcbf3 completed April 10, 2026, 9:39 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f684fee60c81909245d4d70c9338c0 completed May 2, 2026, 11:13 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:29 p.m.