Triple

T12774648
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lady Chatterley's Lover was subject to obscenity trials E305335 entity
Predicate hasNotableCase P7437 FINISHED
Object R v Penguin Books Ltd E1003061 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: R v Penguin Books Ltd | Statement: [Lady Chatterley's Lover was subject to obscenity trials, hasNotableCase, R v Penguin Books Ltd]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: R v Penguin Books Ltd
Context triple: [Lady Chatterley's Lover was subject to obscenity trials, hasNotableCase, R v Penguin Books Ltd]
  • A. R v Penguin Books Ltd chosen
    R v Penguin Books Ltd was a landmark 1960 English obscenity trial in which the publisher of D. H. Lawrence’s novel "Lady Chatterley’s Lover" was acquitted, significantly liberalizing publishing and censorship laws in the UK.
  • B. Irving v Penguin Books Ltd
    Irving v Penguin Books Ltd was a landmark 2000 English libel case in which Holocaust denier David Irving sued historian Deborah Lipstadt and her publisher, resulting in a decisive judgment affirming Irving’s deliberate distortion of historical evidence.
  • C. Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd
    Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd is a landmark 2004 House of Lords decision in English law that developed the modern tort of misuse of private information and clarified the balance between privacy rights and freedom of expression.
  • D. Ruskin v. Whistler libel case
    The Ruskin v. Whistler libel case was an 1878 British lawsuit in which American-born artist James McNeill Whistler sued influential critic John Ruskin for defamation over a harsh review of his painting, highlighting tensions between avant-garde art and traditional criticism.
  • E. Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten
    Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten is a landmark 1917 free speech case in which Judge Learned Hand articulated an influential early limit on government power to punish antiwar expression under the Espionage Act.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf2b43c819098ae5aa68e61ea58 completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d96df6b3c88190b0bbe70de8ddcbf3 completed April 10, 2026, 9:39 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f68eba76008190ad9df2e2a5423471 completed May 2, 2026, 11:54 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:29 p.m.