Triple

T12767620
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Territorial Defence forces (historical continuity) E305164 entity
Predicate hasContinuityIn P106271 FINISHED
Object use of local manpower for defence LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: use of local manpower for defence | Statement: [Territorial Defence forces (historical continuity), hasContinuityIn, use of local manpower for defence]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasContinuityIn
Context triple: [Territorial Defence forces (historical continuity), hasContinuityIn, use of local manpower for defence]
  • A. belongsToContinuity
    Indicates that something is part of, or exists within, a specific narrative or temporal continuity.
  • B. continuityFrom
    Indicates that one entity continues, extends, or proceeds directly from another in a seamless or unbroken manner.
  • C. hasHistoricalContinuityIn chosen
    Indicates that a historical tradition, practice, or state persists or remains continuous within a particular context, place, or period over time.
  • D. hasHistoricalContinuityAs
    Indicates that one entity maintains an ongoing, continuous historical existence or identity as another entity over time.
  • E. hasRepresentationContinuity
    Indicates that one entity maintains a consistent or continuous representational relationship with another across time, context, or state changes.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf2b43c819098ae5aa68e61ea58 completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d96df3b2f88190b37b696400178795 completed April 10, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d96409739881909174ba005a986cb5 completed April 10, 2026, 8:56 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:28 p.m.