Triple
T12759557
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tristero |
E304954
|
entity |
| Predicate | ontologicalStatusInText |
P29186
|
FINISHED |
| Object | possibly real |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: possibly real | Statement: [Tristero, ontologicalStatusInText, possibly real]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ontologicalStatusInText Context triple: [Tristero, ontologicalStatusInText, possibly real]
-
A.
ontologyStatus
Indicates the current state or condition of an entity within an ontology lifecycle (e.g., proposed, active, deprecated, or obsolete).
-
B.
ontologicalStatusInDoctrine
Indicates how an entity’s fundamental nature or mode of existence is defined or classified within a particular doctrine or system of thought.
-
C.
ontologicalClaimAbout
Indicates that one entity makes a statement or assertion about the fundamental nature, existence, or categorization of another entity.
-
D.
ontologicalAspect
Indicates a fundamental mode or category of being that characterizes how something exists or is realized.
-
E.
realityStatus
chosen
Indicates the relationship between an entity and its state of existence or authenticity within a given context or world (e.g., real, fictional, hypothetical, simulated).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf1fcd081909ffb0e0d6fa3a07d |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d96d8d3eb08190ae998df5cc6d9ba6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d96409739881909174ba005a986cb5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:56 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:28 p.m.