Triple
T12755617
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | David J. Brewer |
E304850
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Opinion in In re Debs |
E58074
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Opinion in In re Debs | Statement: [David J. Brewer, notableWork, Opinion in In re Debs]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Opinion in In re Debs Context triple: [David J. Brewer, notableWork, Opinion in In re Debs]
-
A.
In re Debs Supreme Court case
chosen
In re Debs was an 1895 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s authority to use injunctions and troops to end the Pullman Strike, significantly expanding federal power over labor disputes and interstate commerce.
-
B.
Debs v. United States
Debs v. United States was a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case in which socialist leader Eugene V. Debs’s conviction for antiwar speech was upheld, reinforcing broad limits on free speech during wartime.
-
C.
Dissent in the Prize Cases (1863)
Dissent in the Prize Cases (1863) is a notable Supreme Court opinion in which Justice Samuel Nelson argued against the majority’s validation of President Lincoln’s Civil War blockade powers.
-
D.
opinion in Ginzburg v. United States
The opinion in Ginzburg v. United States is a U.S. Supreme Court decision authored by Justice Potter Stewart that addressed the standards for determining obscenity in mailed publications.
-
E.
dissenting opinion in Lochner v. New York
The dissenting opinion in Lochner v. New York is Justice John Marshall Harlan’s influential critique of the Supreme Court’s use of substantive due process to strike down labor regulations, emphasizing judicial restraint and deference to state police powers.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf1fcd081909ffb0e0d6fa3a07d |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d96d8b57b88190b29b8fdca415c81c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:37 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f67c9aa6308190bfcb1511a561c0f9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:27 p.m.