Triple

T12755616
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject David J. Brewer E304850 entity
Predicate notableWork P4 FINISHED
Object Opinion in Muller v. Oregon E726372 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Opinion in Muller v. Oregon | Statement: [David J. Brewer, notableWork, Opinion in Muller v. Oregon]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Opinion in Muller v. Oregon
Context triple: [David J. Brewer, notableWork, Opinion in Muller v. Oregon]
  • A. Muller v. Oregon chosen
    Muller v. Oregon is a landmark 1908 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld limits on women’s working hours, notable for its pioneering use of sociological and empirical data in legal argumentation.
  • B. Muller v. Oregon brief
    The Muller v. Oregon brief is a landmark 1908 legal document, authored by Louis D. Brandeis, that pioneered the use of extensive social science data to defend labor regulations, particularly limiting women’s working hours.
  • C. majority opinion in Bowers v. Hardwick
    The majority opinion in Bowers v. Hardwick is the 1986 U.S. Supreme Court decision, authored by Justice Byron White, that upheld the constitutionality of a Georgia law criminalizing consensual homosexual sodomy, later overturned by Lawrence v. Texas.
  • D. De Jonge v. Oregon
    De Jonge v. Oregon is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the right to peaceful assembly is a fundamental liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and thus applies to the states.
  • E. Buck v. Bell opinion
    The Buck v. Bell opinion is a 1927 U.S. Supreme Court decision, authored by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., that notoriously upheld the constitutionality of compulsory sterilization laws and became a symbol of the excesses of the American eugenics movement.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf1fcd081909ffb0e0d6fa3a07d completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d96d8b57b88190b29b8fdca415c81c completed April 10, 2026, 9:37 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f67c9aa6308190bfcb1511a561c0f9 completed May 2, 2026, 10:37 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:27 p.m.