Triple
T12749267
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tai Yai |
E304686
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicalPolity |
P8531
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Shan States |
E75189
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Shan States | Statement: [Tai Yai, historicalPolity, Shan States]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Shan States Context triple: [Tai Yai, historicalPolity, Shan States]
-
A.
Shan States
chosen
The Shan States were a collection of semi-autonomous, traditionally ruled principalities in what is now eastern Myanmar, historically inhabited by the Shan people and later organized as a distinct administrative region under British colonial rule.
-
B.
Samthar State
Samthar State was a former princely state in colonial India, located in what is now Uttar Pradesh and ruled by a local dynasty under British suzerainty.
-
C.
Rajpipla State
Rajpipla State was a former princely state in British India, located in present-day Gujarat.
-
D.
Bijawar State
Bijawar State was a former princely state in British India, located in the Bundelkhand region of present-day Madhya Pradesh.
-
E.
Maharawat
Maharawat is a hereditary royal title historically used by the ruling monarchs of certain princely states in India, including Pratapgarh.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf1fcd081909ffb0e0d6fa3a07d |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d96bd75f508190aaae0969f33d1523 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:29 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f67c964c508190b4d6a094b388280b |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:27 p.m.