Triple

T12746333
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject iPhone 13 Pro E304611 entity
Predicate notchSizeComparedToPredecessor P82043 FINISHED
Object smaller LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: smaller | Statement: [iPhone 13 Pro, notchSizeComparedToPredecessor, smaller]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notchSizeComparedToPredecessor
Context triple: [iPhone 13 Pro, notchSizeComparedToPredecessor, smaller]
  • A. technologyLevelComparedToPredecessor
    Indicates how the technology level of an entity compares to that of its immediate predecessor.
  • B. comparedToPredecessor chosen
    Indicates that something is being evaluated or measured in relation to the thing that came immediately before it.
  • C. scaleComparison
    Indicates a relationship where two or more entities are compared in terms of their size, magnitude, or scale relative to one another.
  • D. typicalEfficiencyComparedToPredecessor
    Indicates how the usual or average efficiency of something compares to that of its predecessor.
  • E. emissionsComparedToPredecessor
    Indicates how the emissions of an entity compare in magnitude (e.g., higher, lower, or equal) to those of its immediate predecessor.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf1426c8190a4402e1c4cdec33a completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d96d89ea70819098c470344f172167 completed April 10, 2026, 9:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d96406e97c8190b79081039847115c completed April 10, 2026, 8:56 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:27 p.m.