Triple

T12742735
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gorals E304526 entity
Predicate haveDistinctive P18160 FINISHED
Object Goral dialects LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Goral dialects | Statement: [Gorals, haveDistinctive, Goral dialects]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: haveDistinctive
Context triple: [Gorals, haveDistinctive, Goral dialects]
  • A. hasDistinctFeature chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific characteristic or attribute that differentiates it from others.
  • B. hasDistinctiveShape
    Indicates that an entity possesses a shape or form that is notably different from others and can be easily recognized or distinguished.
  • C. isCeremoniallyDistinctFrom
    Indicates that two entities are formally separated or differentiated from each other within a ritual, ceremonial, or symbolic context.
  • D. distinctiveMarking
    Indicates that one entity bears a unique or distinguishing visual feature or pattern that sets it apart from others.
  • E. hasDistinction
    Indicates that one entity possesses, is awarded, or is recognized with a special honor, title, or mark of excellence in relation to another entity or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf1426c8190a4402e1c4cdec33a completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d96d89ea70819098c470344f172167 completed April 10, 2026, 9:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d96406e97c8190b79081039847115c completed April 10, 2026, 8:56 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:26 p.m.