Triple
T12741967
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Doaba (Punjab) |
E304508
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDialect |
P4251
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Doabi Punjabi |
E304816
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Doabi Punjabi | Statement: [Doaba (Punjab), hasDialect, Doabi Punjabi]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Doabi Punjabi Context triple: [Doaba (Punjab), hasDialect, Doabi Punjabi]
-
A.
Doabi Punjabi
chosen
Doabi Punjabi is a regional variety of the Punjabi language spoken primarily in the Doaba region of the Indian state of Punjab.
-
B.
Malwai Punjabi
Malwai Punjabi is a regional variety of the Punjabi language spoken primarily in the Malwa region of the Indian state of Punjab.
-
C.
Potohari Punjabi
Potohari Punjabi is a regional variety of the Punjabi language spoken primarily in Pakistan’s Potohar Plateau and surrounding northern Punjab areas.
-
D.
Majhi Punjabi
Majhi Punjabi is the central and most prestigious dialect of the Punjabi language, traditionally spoken in the Majha region of Punjab, including areas around Amritsar and Lahore.
-
E.
Tanoli Hindko
Tanoli Hindko is a regional variety of the Hindko language traditionally spoken by members of the Tanoli community in parts of northern Pakistan.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf1426c8190a4402e1c4cdec33a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d96bd321bc81908eb61cc05b550754 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:29 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f67c91ed7c81909165dc300d5b23ae |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:26 p.m.