Triple

T12738372
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject European Service Module E304422 entity
Predicate collaborationFramework P1854 FINISHED
Object ESA–NASA barter agreement LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ESA–NASA barter agreement | Statement: [European Service Module, collaborationFramework, ESA–NASA barter agreement]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: collaborationFramework
Context triple: [European Service Module, collaborationFramework, ESA–NASA barter agreement]
  • A. collaborationAspect
    Indicates a specific characteristic, dimension, or feature of how entities collaborate or work together.
  • B. collaborationModel chosen
    Indicates the type or structure of cooperative interaction or joint work established between entities.
  • C. platformCollaboration
    Indicates a collaborative relationship where multiple entities work together or integrate their efforts on or through a shared platform.
  • D. collaborationOf
    Indicates a relationship in which two or more entities work together jointly toward a shared goal or outcome.
  • E. collaborationArea
    Indicates the domain, topic, or field in which two or more entities work together or collaborate.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf1426c8190a4402e1c4cdec33a completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d96d89ea70819098c470344f172167 completed April 10, 2026, 9:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d96403957c81909acdee7bdae71696 completed April 10, 2026, 8:56 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:26 p.m.