Triple

T12728295
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject William John Cunningham E304163 entity
Predicate familyName P18 FINISHED
Object Cunningham E139353 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cunningham | Statement: [William John Cunningham, familyName, Cunningham]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cunningham
Context triple: [William John Cunningham, familyName, Cunningham]
  • A. Cunningham chosen
    Cunningham is a common Scottish surname borne by numerous notable individuals across fields such as technology, politics, sports, and the arts.
  • B. Cuninghamme
    Cuninghamme is an alternative historical or variant spelling of the surname Cunningham, a Scottish family name associated with the region of Ayrshire.
  • C. Cooley
    Cooley was a party in the landmark 1852 U.S. Supreme Court case Cooley v. Board of Wardens, which helped define the scope of state versus federal power over commerce.
  • D. Pittman
    Pittman is a surname of English origin borne by various notable individuals across politics, sports, and the arts.
  • E. Coney Weston
    Coney Weston is a small rural village and civil parish in the English county of Suffolk.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf1426c8190a4402e1c4cdec33a completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d964172490819080cd022ff8290b6e completed April 10, 2026, 8:56 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f67c884bd08190bf0022e8303a4987 completed May 2, 2026, 10:36 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:25 p.m.