Triple
T12724727
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Missisquoi dialect |
E304073
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | regional variety of Western Abenaki |
C1356
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: regional variety of Western Abenaki Context triple: [Missisquoi dialect, instanceOf, regional variety of Western Abenaki]
-
A.
Algonquian language
chosen
An Algonquian language is any member of a family of Indigenous languages of North America, historically spoken from the Atlantic coast to the Great Plains and characterized by complex morphology and polysynthetic structure.
-
B.
Eastern Algonquian people
Eastern Algonquian people are Indigenous groups of the Northeastern Woodlands of North America who historically spoke Eastern Algonquian languages and share related cultural, linguistic, and historical traditions.
-
C.
Southern Wakashan language
A Southern Wakashan language is a member of the southern branch of the Wakashan language family, traditionally spoken by Indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest Coast, particularly on Vancouver Island and adjacent mainland areas.
-
D.
Yavapai language variety
A Yavapai language variety is a specific form or dialect of the Yavapai language, distinguished by unique phonological, lexical, or grammatical features used by a particular Yavapai-speaking community.
-
E.
Muskogean language
A Muskogean language is any member of a family of Native American languages originally spoken in the southeastern United States, including Creek, Choctaw, Chickasaw, and related tongues.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf084148190ab9d513dc0735af4 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:25 p.m.