Triple
T12716768
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nefud Desert |
E303862
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasEcologyCharacteristic |
P22447
|
FINISHED |
| Object | sparse vegetation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sparse vegetation | Statement: [Nefud Desert, hasEcologyCharacteristic, sparse vegetation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEcologyCharacteristic Context triple: [Nefud Desert, hasEcologyCharacteristic, sparse vegetation]
-
A.
hasEcology
Indicates that an entity has a particular ecological context, such as its habitat, environmental role, or interactions within an ecosystem.
-
B.
hasBiodiversityFeature
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a specific biodiversity-related characteristic, attribute, or element.
-
C.
hasEcologicalSite
Indicates that one entity is associated with, or located within, a particular ecological site or ecological classification unit.
-
D.
containsEcologicalTypes
Indicates that one entity includes or encompasses specific ecological types or categories within it.
-
E.
ecologicalStatus
Indicates the condition or health of an ecosystem or environment, often in terms of its quality, integrity, or degree of disturbance.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf084148190ab9d513dc0735af4 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9620bd6148190a2f50067a4c18c14 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d960c088dc8190b0e63312c54e4c6c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:42 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:23 p.m.