Triple
T12707647
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Marisus |
E303629
|
entity |
| Predicate | modernEquivalentName |
P20950
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Mureș |
E52991
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mureș | Statement: [Marisus, modernEquivalentName, Mureș]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mureș Context triple: [Marisus, modernEquivalentName, Mureș]
-
A.
Mureș River
chosen
The Mureș River is a significant Central European waterway that flows through Transylvania and western Romania before joining the Tisza River in Hungary.
-
B.
Timiș River
The Timiș River is a major watercourse in western Romania and northern Serbia that flows through the Banat region before joining the Danube.
-
C.
Arieș River
The Arieș River is a significant river in western Romania that flows through the Apuseni Mountains and the historical region of Transylvania.
-
D.
Timiș
Timiș is a river in Central and Eastern Europe that flows through the Banat region of Romania and Serbia before joining the Danube.
-
E.
Argeș River
The Argeș River is a major river in southern Romania that flows through the Carpathian foothills toward the Danube, passing important cities such as Pitești along its course.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdef90d48190b46b88270e780946 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9620663e881908d367170ed6d2c81 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:48 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fd7a2796cc81908b6d4cf71f39e88a |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:52 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:23 p.m.