Triple
T12707572
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Arad County |
E303627
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOf |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Crișana region |
E163056
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Crișana region | Statement: [Arad County, partOf, Crișana region]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Crișana region Context triple: [Arad County, partOf, Crișana region]
-
A.
Crișana
chosen
Crișana is a historical region in western Romania, known for its multicultural heritage and location between the Apuseni Mountains and the Hungarian border.
-
B.
Maramureș region
The Maramureș region is a historic area in northern Romania renowned for its well-preserved rural traditions, wooden churches, and distinctive folk culture.
-
C.
Vrancea County
Vrancea County is an administrative region in eastern Romania, known for its seismic activity and wine-producing areas.
-
D.
Piatra-Olt
Piatra-Olt is a small town in southern Romania known as a local railway junction and administrative center within Olt County.
-
E.
Bistrița-Năsăud
Bistrița-Năsăud is a county in northern Romania, in the historical region of Transylvania, known for its mountainous landscapes, medieval heritage, and multicultural traditions.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdef90d48190b46b88270e780946 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9620663e881908d367170ed6d2c81 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:48 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f739688734819092b14bd3edacd4ef |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:23 p.m.